Technology in Education

A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Teaching and Learning With Technology on Student Outcomes

References

References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.

*Aeby, V. G., Powell, J. V., & Carpenter-Aeby, T. (1999-2000). Effects of SuccessMaker computerized curriculum on the behavior of disruptive students. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 28(4), 335-347.

*Akpan, J. P., & Andre, T. (2000). Using a computer simulation before dissection to help students learn anatomy. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 19, 297-313.

*Alfassi, M. (2000). Using information and communication technology (ICT) to foster literacy and facilitate discourse within the classroom. Education Media International, 37, 137-148.

Allen, R. (2001, Fall). Technology and learning: How schools map routes to technology's promised land. ASCD Curriculum Update, 1-3, 6-8.

*Alspaugh, J.W. (1999). The relationship between the number of students per computer and educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Research, 21(2), 141-150.

Arthur, W., Jr., Bennett, W., Jr., & Huffcutt, A. I. (2001). Conducting meta-analysis using SAS. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

*Bain, A., Huss, P., & Kwong, H. (2000). The evaluation of a hypertext discussion tool for teaching English literature to secondary school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(2), 203-216.

*Barron, A. E., Hogarty, K. Y., Kromery, J. D., & Lenkway, P. (1999). An examination of the relationships between student conduct and the number of computers per student in Florida schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 98-107.

Bayraktar, S. (2001-2002). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in science education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 173-188.

Blok, H., Oostdam, R., Otter, M. E., & Overmaat, M. (2002). Computer-assisted instruction in support of beginning reading instruction: A review. Review of Educational Research, 72, 101-130.

*Brown, S. W., Boyer, M. A., Mayall, H. J., Johnson, P. R., Meng, L., Butler, M. J., et al. (2003). The GlobalEd Project: Gender differences in a problem-based learning environment of international negotiations. Instructional Science, 31, 255-276.

*Butzin, S. M. (2001). Using instructional technology in transformed learning environments: An evaluation of Project CHILD. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 367-373.

Campbell Collaboration (2002). About the Campbell Collaboration. Retrieved August 1, 2002, from http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/FraAbout.html

Cavanaugh, C. S. (2001). The effectiveness of interactive distance education technologies in K-12 learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7, 73-88.

Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence. (2002). The five standards for effective pedagogy. Retrieved December 9, 2002, from http://www.crede.ucsc.edu/standards/standards.html

*Chera, P., & Wood, C. (2003). Animated multimedia "talking books" can promote phonological awareness in children beginning to read. Learning and Instruction, 13, 33-52.

Christmann, E., & Badgett, J. (1999). A comparative analysis of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on student achievement in differing science and demographical areas. Journals of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18, 135-143.

Christmann, E. P., Badgett, J., & Lucking, R. (1997). Microcomputer-based computer-assisted instruction within differing subject areas: A statistical deduction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16, 281-296.

Christmann, E. P., Lucking, R. A., & Badgett, J. L. (1997). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction on the academic achievement of secondary students: A meta-analytic comparison between urban, suburban, and rural educational settings. Computers in the Schools, 13(3/4), 31-40.

*Churach, D., & Fisher, D. (2001). Science students surf the Web: Effects on constructivist classroom environments. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20, 221-247.

*Cohen, V. L. (2001). Learning styles and technology in a ninth-grade high school population. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 355-366.

Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Dalton, S. S. (1998). Pedagogy matters: Standards for effective teaching practice (Research Report No. 4). Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence, University of California. Retrieved December 9, 2002, from http://www.cal.org/crede/pubs/research/RR4.pdf

*Dixon, J. K. (1997). Computer use and visualization in students' construction of reflection and rotation concepts. School Science and Mathematics, 97, 352-358.

*Doty, D.E., Popplewell, S. R., & Byers, G. O. (2001). Interactive CD-ROM storybooks and young readers' reading comprehension. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 374-383.

Durlak, J. A. (1995). Understanding meta-analysis. In L.G. Grimm & P.R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 319-352). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

*Dybdahl, C. S., Shaw, D. G., & Blahous, E. (1997). The impact of the computer on writing: No simple answers. Computers in the Schools, 13(3/4), 41-53.

*Erdner, R.A., Guy, R.F., & Bush, A. (1998). The impact of a year of computer-assisted instruction on the development of first grade learning skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18(4), 369-386.

*Ekane, W. W., & Maiken, D. (1997). The English vocabulary-technology connection: A third world experience. Education Media International, 34, 125-127.

*Estep, S. G., McInerney, W. D., Vockell, E., & Kosmoski, G. (1999-2000). An investigation of the relationship between integrated learning systems and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 28(1), 5-19.

Glass, G. V. (2000). Meta-analysis at 25. Retrieved December 9, 2002, from http://glass.ed.asu.edu/gene/papers/meta25.html

Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

*Harwell, S. H., Gunter, S., Montgomery, S., Shelton, C., & West, D. (2001). Technology integration and the classroom learning environment: Research for action. Learning Environments Research, 3, 259-286.

*Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Bar-Natan, I. (2002). Writing development of Arab and Jewish students using cooperative learning (CL) and computer-mediated communication (CMC). Computers & Education, 39, 19-36.

*Hopson, M. H., Simms, R. L., & Knezek, G. A. (2001-2002). Using a technology-enriched environment to improve higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 109-119.

Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

International Reading Association. (2002). What is evidence-based reading instruction? Newark, DE: Author.

*Keogh, T., Barnes, P., Joiner, R., & Littleton, K. (2000). Gender, pair composition and computer versus paper presentations of an English language task. Educational Psychology, 20, 33-44.

*Ko, Seonju. (2002). An empirical analysis of children's thinking and learning in a computer game context. Educational Psychology, 22, 219-233.

*Kramarski, B., & Feldman, Y. (2000). Internet in the classroom: Effects on reading comprehension, motivation and metacognitive awareness. Education Media International, 37, 149-155.

Kulik, C., & Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 75-94.

Lee, J. (1999). Effectiveness of computer-based instructional simulation: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26, 71-85.

Liao, Y. K., & Bright, G. W. (1991). Effects of computer programming on cognitive outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24, 367-380.

Lipsey, N. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.

Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

*Liu, M. (1998). The effect of hypermedia authoring on elementary school students' creative thinking. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19, 27-51.

*Liu, X., Macmillan, R., & Timmons, V. (1998). Assessing the impact of computer integration on students. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, 189-203.

Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d'Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 449-521.

*Lynch, L., Fawcett, A. J., & Nicolson, R. I. (2000). Computer-assisted reading intervention in a secondary school: An evaluation study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31, 333-348.

*Lynch, W., & Clarke, S. (1997). The role of the classroom computer in the promotion of oracy. Research in Education, 58, 1-9.

MacArthur, C. A., Haynes, J. A., & Malouf, D. B. (1986). Learning disabled students' engaged time and classroom interaction: The impact of computer assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2, 189-198.

*Matthew, K. (1997). A comparison of the influence of interactive CD-ROM storybooks and traditional print storybooks on reading comprehension. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29, 263-275.

*McDonald, K. K., & Hannafin, R. D. (2003). Using web-based computer games to meet the demands of today's high-stakes testing: a mixed method inquiry. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 459-472.

*Michael, K. Y. (2001). The effect of a computer simulation activity versus a hands-on activity on product creativity in technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 13(1), 31-43.

*Mitchell, M. J., & Fox, B. J. (2001). The effects of computer software for developing phonological awareness in low-progress readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 40, 315-332.

Murphy, R., Penuel, W., Means, B., Korbak, C., Whaley, A., & Allen, J. (2002). E-DESK: A review of recent evidence on discrete educational software (SRI International Report). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

National Reading Panel. (2001). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: Author.

National Research Council. (1999). Improving student learning: A strategic plan for education research and its utilization. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Niemiec, R. P., Sikorski, C., & Walberg, H. J. (1996). Learner-control effects: A review of reviews and a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15, 157-174.

Niemiec, R. P., & Walberg, H. J. (1992). The effects of computers on learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 17, 99-108.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002). Retrieved December 4, 2002, from http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ESEA02/

Ouyang, J. (1993). Meta-analysis: CAI at the level of elementary education. Paper presented at the World Conference on Education Multimedia and Hypermedia, Orlando, FL.

Penuel, W., Kim, D., Michalchik, V., Lewis, S., Means, B., Murphy, R., et al. (2002). Use of educational technology in home and school: A review of the knowledge base and case studies of best practice (SRI International Report). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

*Raghavan, K., Sartoris, M. L., & Glaser, R. (1997). The impact of model-centered instruction on student learning: The area and volume units. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16, 363-404.

*Roberts, D. L., & Stephens, L. J. (1999). The effect of the frequency of usage of computer software in high school geometry. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18, 23-30.

*Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Honnay, L. (2001). Collateral benefits of an interactive literacy program for grade 1 and 2 students. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 219-234.

Ryan, A. W. (1991). Meta-analysis of achievement effects of microcomputer applications in elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27, 161-184.

Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1992). Teaching in high-tech environments: Classroom management revisited. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 479-505.

Schacter, J. (2001). The impact of education technology on student achievement: What the most current research has to say. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology.

*Scheidet, R. A. (2003). Improving student achievement by infusion a web-based curriculum into global history. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36, 77-94.

Schofield, J. W., & Verban, D. (1988). Computer usage in teaching mathematics: Issues which need answers. In D. A. Grouws & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching (Vol. I, pp. 169-193). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Sivin-Kachala, J. (1998). Report on the effectiveness of technology in schools, 1990-1997. Washington, DC: Software Publisher's Association.

*Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2002). Multimedia support of early literacy learning. Computers and Education, 39, 207-221.

*Sherer, M. (1998). The effect of computerized simulation games on the moral development of junior and senior high-school students. Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 375-386.

Swan, K., & Mitrani, M. (1993). The changing nature of teaching and learning in computer-based classrooms. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26, 40-54.

Tharp, R. G. (1997). From at-risk to excellence: Research, theory, and principles for practice. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence.

Tharp, R. G., Estrada, P., Dalton, S. S., & Yamauchi, L. A. (2000). Teaching transformed: Achieving excellence, fairness, inclusion, and harmony. Boulder, CO: Westview.

*Thomas, M., & Hofmeister, D. (2002). Assessing the effectiveness of technology integration: message boards for strengthening literacy. Computers & Education, 38, 233-240.

*Tsou, W., Wang, W., & Li, H.-Y. (2002). How computers facilitate English foreign language learners acquire English abstract words. Computers & Education, 39, 415-428.

Viadero, D. (2002. September 4). Education department picks groups to develop database of effective practices. Education Week. Retrieved December 9, 2002, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/ew_printstory.cfm?slug=01whatworks.h22

Waxman, H. C., & G. W. Bright (Eds.). (1993). Approaches to research in teacher education and technology. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers and Education.

Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. L. (1996). Classroom instruction differences by level of technology use in middle school mathematics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 147-159.

*Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. L. (1996-97). Differences by level of technology use on students' motivation, anxiety, and classroom learning environment in mathematics. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 25(1), 67-77.

Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 1-22.

Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.

Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service Policy Information Center.

*Woodul, C. E., Vitale, M. E., & Scott, B. J. (1999-2000). Using a cooperative multimedia learning environment to enhance learning and affective self-perceptions of at-risk students in grade 8. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 28(3), 239-252.

Worthen, B. R., Van Dusen, L. M., & Sailor, P. J. (1994). A comparative study of the impact of integrated learning systems on students' time-on-task. International Journal of Educational Research, 21, 25-37.

*Ysseldyke, J., Spicuzza, R., Kosciolek, S., & Boys, C. (2003). Effects of a learning information system on mathematics achievement and classroom structure. The Journal of Educational Research, 96, 163-173.

Previous | Contents | Next